Legal Opinion

Harold Friedman v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 16, 1967No. 18245_1PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLOYD R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, Harold Friedman, was convicted on a one-count indictment charging a violation of Title 18, § 1001 of the United States Code, which provides:

“Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations, * * * shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.” (Emphasis supplied.)

The indictment charges…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. GillilandSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. BramblettSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Tad R. Knowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  5. Billy Maurice Ogden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  2. Bryson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. Rodriguez-RiosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Fred LambertCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API