Legal Opinion

Hanlon v. O'Keeffe

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Rots. Daniel D. Fisher, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauee, P. J.

This is an action of replevin growing out of a horse trade. The plaintiff’s claim is, that his animal got into defendant’s possession on an agreement to exchange horses on certain terms, which agreement was never consummated ; that he thereupon demanded the return of his animal, and, upon the defendant’s refusal to return it, brought the present action. The defense is, that the trade was consummated, and that the title, to the animal passed to the defendant. There was judgment for plaintiff in the trial court, and the error assigned on this appeal is that the judgment was the *274result of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark v. Famous Shoe & Clothing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Proffer v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Hanlon v. O'KeefeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API