Legal Opinion
Castillo v. 711 Group, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 12, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.
Third-party defendant 3-D Laboratory, Inc. moved for summary judgment dismissing the third-party action against it, claiming the injuries plaintiff sustained to his left index finger did not qualify as a “grave injury” under Workers’ Compensation Law § 11. Supreme Court denied the motion. The Appellate Division affirmed the denial of the third-party defendant’s motion, but searched the record and awarded plaintiff and defendant/third-party…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Castro v. United Container MacHinery Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Blackburn v. Wysong & Miles Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Mentesana v. Bernard Janowitz Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- McCoy v. Queens Hydraulic Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by3 opinions
- Caputo v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Cocom-Tambriz v. Surita Demolition Contracting, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Velez v. Eagle Bending Machines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021