Legal Opinion

Colinares v. Washington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.), dated February 22, 1999, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Berlinda Colinares did not suffer a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

*351Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Loiseau v Maxwell, 256 AD2d 450; Edwards v De Haven, 155 AD2d 757; Post v…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Loiseau v. MaxwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Edwards v. DeHavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Post v. BroderickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Keith v. Suburban Transit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API