Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Leake

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1838PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court delivered by

Edwards, Judge.

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Leake against Elliott. Pleas, non assumpsit and statute oflimi-tations, and issue on each.

Eighteen or twenty years ago, Elliott and Leake resided in the State of Kentucky; and while there, and about that time, Elliott sold Leake twenty acres of land, for two hundred dollars. The contract was never reduced to writing. Leake paid Elliott the two hundred dollars, the price of the land. In 1834, Elliott admitted that he “had got from Leake two hundred dollars* for land in Kentucky-* and that he had never…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chidsey v. PowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  2. Boyd v. HurlbutSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  3. Berryman v. BeckerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Mastin v. BranhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  5. Wells v. HargraveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API