Legal Opinion

SCHOMER v. STATE Ex BETTMAN, Etc

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1933No. 599PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By ROSS, J.

The first assignment of error is addressed to the activity of the attorney for the widow, who admitted in his testimony that he had been active in assisting the Attorney General' in trying the case, interviewing witnesses, and that he went in and out of the court room while engaged in such assistance during the trial.

The attorney was an officer of the Court and subject to the control of the trial judge. We find nothing in the record to' indicate that the court abused his discretion in permitting the activity on the part of the attorney of which complaint is made. If the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. GlickOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Nunn v. DavidsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API