Legal Opinion
Arnreich v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 19, 1926PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.
Ferdinand M. Arnreich, George Weil and George H. Sloatfield were separately indicted and convicted in the Criminal Court of Baltimore City for the violation of section 12 of article 56, of the Annotated Code of 1924. This section provides:
“No person or corporation other than the grower, maker or manufacturer shall barter or sell or otherwise dispose of, or shall offer for sale any goods, chattels, wares or merchandise within this State without first obtaining a license in the manner herein prescribed.”
Each of these parties was, in separate trials, adjudged guilty and sentenced to pay a line…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Carlin v. Western Assurance Co. of Toronto, CanadaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
- County Commissioners of Carroll County v. B. F. Shriver Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- H. M. Rowe Co. v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Hays v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1829
- Mayor of Baltimore v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Dvorine v. Castelberg Jewelry Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Perdue, Inc. v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Hearst Corp. v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- MacKe Co. v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Finan v. M. C.C. of CumberlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.