Succession of Lund v. Baccich & De Montluzin
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Rapides; W. F. Blackman, Judge. Proceedings by Succession of Lund against Baccicb & De Montluzin, adjudieatees, on rule to show cause why they should not be ordered to accept title and make payment. Erom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
BREAUX, O. J.
Baccich & De Montluzin, at a succession sale of property belonging to the succession of H. W. S. Lund, became the adjudieatees of the tract of land of the late H. W. S. Lund. After the adjudication, they refused to sign the deed of- sale made to them in accordance with the adjudication.
Because they would not comply with their bid, the testamentary executrix of the succession sought by rule to compel them.
The rule recites the price of the adjudication, and gives a description of the property. It also mentions that 10 per cent, of the price was deposited as required,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davis v. Mercantile Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Landry v. ConnelySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843
- Zagame v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Testamentary of Lewis v. CasenaveSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
- Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.