Jacobsen v. Haugen

529 N.W.2d 882 (1995)

Ruvold E. JACOBSEN and Phyllis Jacobsen, Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

Gene HAUGEN, Defendant and Appellee.

Civ. No. 940277.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

April 13, 1995.

Charles Thomas Hvass, Jr. (argued), Minneapolis, MN, for plaintiffs and appellants.

Lyle W. Kirmis (argued), Zuger Kirmis & Smith, Bismarck, for defendant and appellee.

NEUMANN, Justice.

Ruvold and Phyllis Jacobsen appealed from the trial court's judgment[1] granting Gene Haugen's Rule 50, N.D.R.Civ.P.,[2] motion for judgment as a matter of law. We conclude that this malpractice action was barred by the statute…