Legal Opinion

Jenco v. Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 2, 2001No. CIV A 00-549 RCLPublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LAMBERTH, District Judge.

On March 15, 2000, the plaintiffs 1 filed a multi-count complaint alleging that the defendants were responsible for Lawrence M. Jenco’s kidnapping, detention, and torture over a Vfe year period. The defendants, despite being properly served with process, failed to answer this charge in any way. Thus, the Court entered the defendants’ default on January 5, 2001.

Notwithstanding this entry of default, a default judgment against a foreign state may not be entered until the plaintiffs have “established] [their] claim or right to relief by evidence that is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Saudi Arabia v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Flood v. KuhnSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Truman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Percy King and George Russell v. Crossland Savings Bank and American Express CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Murphy v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  3. Peterson v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. In Re Islamic Republic of Iran Terrorism LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  5. Reed v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API