Noblit v. Noblit
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
A petition to set aside an order admitting to probate the will of Gr. H. B. Noblit was denied, and petitioner has appealed. Both the will and the codicil are written in longhand, and may have been written by the testator; however, neither was admitted to probate as a holographic will or codicil.
The will proper leaves both the real and personal property to the widow, and does not mention the testator’s daughter, Maude; but the codicil bequeaths to her the sum of $1.00. There is an attestation clause to the will, but none to the codicil. However, the codicil is signed by two witnesses with the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Yeates v. YeatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- McPherson v. McKay, Admr.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
3Cited by1 opinion
- Noblit v. NoblitSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954