Dolby v. Whaley
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, C. J.:
The objection is overruled. The record entry of the justice “The petition to reopen the above case, filed * * * August 15th, 1936, was denied by me” is ambiguous as to the precise action taken by him. From that entry it is not clear whether the justice refused to entertain Whaley’s petition, or whether, after a hearing on the merits of the case, he held that Whaley had no claim against Dolby for work and labor done. You cannot contradict, alter or vary a judicial record, but paroi evidence may be admitted for the purpose of explaining an entry in such a record, which is not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- duPont v. MillsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
- Williams v. DaiseySuperior Court of Delaware · 1935
- Blood v. Crew Levick Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Delaware Lodge No. 1 v. AllmonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1897
- Lofland v. McDanielSuperior Court of Delaware · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lemon v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- Hanna v. RiggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976