Legal Opinion

Enbridge Energy Co. v. Dane Cnty.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 24, 2018No. Appeal Nos. 2016AP2503; 2017AP13Published

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

¶ 1 This case involves a conditional use permit issued by a Dane County zoning committee that allows the operator of a crude oil pipeline to significantly expand the volume of oil pumped through the line. The permit contains conditions requiring Enbridge Energy Company to "procure and maintain" insurance with detailed specifications that would, in the view of the zoning committee, ensure the availability of sufficient funds for remediation, clean up, and payment for damages in the event of a crude oil spill.1

¶ 2 One notable feature of this case is that the state legislature enacted a new law…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Just v. Land Reclamation Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Schneider v. Dumbarton Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  4. Strenke v. HognerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Czapinski v. St. Francis Hospital, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API