Legal Opinion
Harpell v. Pub. Service Coordinated Transport
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 12, 1955PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
35 N.J. Super. 354 (1955)
114 A.2d 295
ALBERT E. HARPELL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
PUBLIC SERVICE COORDINATED TRANSPORT, ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 25, 1955.
Decided May 12, 1955.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. Luke A. Kiernan, Jr., argued the cause for defendant-appellant.
Mr. Thomas F. Hueston argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.
Defendant, a common carrier of passengers for hire, appeals from a judgment entered upon a verdict of a jury for damages in favor of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Palestroni v. JacobsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Exton v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
- Clemens v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
- Nusser v. United Parcel Service of N.Y., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Fewings v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tormo v. YormarkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
- Homan v. County of DadeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- McCappin v. Park Capitol Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Florida East Coast Railway Company v. BoothDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Massotto v. Public Service Coord. TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.