Legal Opinion
Blinn v. Law Firm of Johnson, Beaman, Bratch, Beal & White, LLP
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 29, 2011No. 27A05-1011-CT-721PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARNES, Judge.
Case Summary
Edwin Blinn appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his complaint. We affirm.
Issue
Blinn raises one issue, which we restate as whether the trial court properly dismissed his complaint.
Facts
On April 26, 2007, Blinn filed a pro se complaint against Shane Beal and Beal’s law firm, Johnson, Beaman, Bratch, Beal, and White, LLP (“the Firm”), alleging that Beal negligently represented him in federal criminal proceedings and that the Firm was vicariously liable for Beal’s malpractice. On November 1, 2007, Blinn, who was then represented by counsel, filed an amended…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Caesars Riverboat Casino, LLC v. KephartIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Vesolowski Ex Rel. Vesolowski v. RepayIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
- Eads v. Community HospitalIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Pennsylvania Co. v. GoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- Ferdinand Furn. Co., Inc. v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shane Beal and The Bar Plan Mutual Insurance Company v. Edwin Blinn, Jr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014