Legal Opinion

Hazeltine v. Keenan

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1904PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Éandolph. County. Petition by D. D. Ha.zeltine against L. H. Keenan and others. Decree for plaintiff, and certain defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

BraNNON, Judge:

I-Iazcltine, L. II. Keenan and Wilson together effected a sale to Patterson of some timber belonging to Caplinger, the price being $2.500, of which $2,000 was paid Caplinger by Patterson, and $500 was profit to Hazeltine, Keenan and Wilson, and for this balance Patterson made two promisary notes, one for $200, and one for $300, purporting to be negotiable, payable on their faces to “L. H. Keenan, attorney.” Before maturity of the notes L. H. Keenan transferred one of them to his father, by an endorsement reading, “Transferred the within note to Thomas G. Keenan, L. H. Keenan,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shaw v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Marbury v. EhlenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  3. Third National Bank v. LangeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  4. Bank v. LooneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Burrough v. ElyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Matter of HeinsheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Ford v. H. C. Brown & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State ex rel. Showen v. O'BrienWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Long v. City Nat. Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Trickett v. LauritaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API