Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lawrence M. Tropf v. R. James Nicholson

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided August 24, 2006No. 03-1923Published

1ConcurrenceGreene, Chief Judge

I concur with the holdings in this case. I write separately, however, because I would hold additionally that Mr. Tropfs constitutional argument is without merit and should be disposed of accordingly. The Equal Protection Clause “is essentially a direction that all persons similarly situated should be treated alike.” Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctr., Inc., 473 U.S. 432, 439, 105 S.Ct. 3249, 87 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985). Mr. Tropf argues that treating his arm and back disabilities differently in the rating schedule is a violation of due process; he asserts that he should be awarded a compensable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Reeves v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
  3. Clarke v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API