Legal Opinion
United States v. Earl D. Sons Jessye M. Sons and Church of Christ
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 15, 1992No. 91-55450Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
963 F.2d 381
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Earl D. SONS; Jessye M. Sons; and Church of Christ,
Defendants-Appellants.
No. 91-55450.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 15, 1992.
1
Before JAMES R. BROWNING and FARRIS, Circuit Judges, and George,** District Judge, sitting by designation.
2
MEMORANDUM***
3
The Sons…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Animal Protection Institute of America v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Gruver v. Midas International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991