Legal Opinion

Kruegel v. Cockrell Gray

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 2, 1912PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Dallas County; J. C. Roberts, Judge. Action by Herman Kruegel against Cock-rell & Gray and others. From a judgment dismissing the petition, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, C. J.

This is an action for slander and libel brought by Herman Kruegel, plaintiff, against J. E. Cockrell and Edward Gray, and Curtis Hancock, as attorneys at law, and E. B. Muse, as district judge, to recover damages for malicious utterances of Curtis Hancock made by said Hancock during 'the trial of a cause in the Forty-Fourth judicial district court in Dallas county, before E. B. Muse, judge presiding. Collusion and conspiracy between all the defendants was alleged. Defendants pleaded absolute privilege in making such utterance, the same being in the process of a judicial trial, and interposed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lytle v. HalffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  2. Runge v. FranklinTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Wheeler v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Kruegel v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Denton Publishing Company v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Connellee v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Koehler v. DuboseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Peerless Oil & Gas Co. v. TeasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Butler v. LillyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API