Johnson v. Tsukahara
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT BY
MARUMOTO, J.
The main question for decision on this appeal is whether a trial court may amend a verdict on a post-verdict affidavit of a juror, obtained after the jury has been dis charged, and enter a judgment on the verdict as so amended.
Appellants Clarence R. Johnson and Sarah L. Johnson are husband and wife. They were plaintiffs in a tort action filed in the circuit court against appellee Tatsumi Tsukahara, as defendant, for damages allegedly resulting from a rear-end automobile collision, in which the husband was driver of the front automobile, the wife was a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McCabe Lumber Co. v. Beaufort County Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Roadruck v. SchultzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
- Astor Electric Service v. CabreraSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Burlingame v. Central R. of Minn.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Figg v. SchroederCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Bitzan v. ParisiWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Barretto v. AkauHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
- Ditto v. McCurdyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
- Ditto v. McCurdyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.