Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Tsukahara

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1968No. 4694PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

MARUMOTO, J.

The main question for decision on this appeal is whether a trial court may amend a verdict on a post-verdict affidavit of a juror, obtained after the jury has been dis charged, and enter a judgment on the verdict as so amended.

Appellants Clarence R. Johnson and Sarah L. Johnson are husband and wife. They were plaintiffs in a tort action filed in the circuit court against appellee Tatsumi Tsukahara, as defendant, for damages allegedly resulting from a rear-end automobile collision, in which the husband was driver of the front automobile, the wife was a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. McCabe Lumber Co. v. Beaufort County Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Roadruck v. SchultzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  4. Astor Electric Service v. CabreraSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  5. Burlingame v. Central R. of Minn.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Figg v. SchroederCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  2. Bitzan v. ParisiWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Barretto v. AkauHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Ditto v. McCurdyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Ditto v. McCurdyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API