Legal Opinion
In Re Ross
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California
Decided June 19, 1991No. Bankruptcy LA 88-19788PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION RE MOTION TO COMPEL AMENDMENT
LISA HILL FENNING, Bankruptcy Judge.
In 1988 Mary Ross (“Debtor”) filed a voluntary chapter 11 petition that was later converted to a chapter 7 case. Among Debtor’s claimed exemptions is an exemption for alimony and child support with a listed value of “unknown.”
The Chapter 7 Trustee (“Trustee”) has moved for entry of an order to compel Debtor to amend her schedules to list a specific value for her claimed alimony exemption. Because the exemption claim is not described with sufficient specificity to be effective, the Court holds that Debtor must amend her…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Jerry Payne and Deborah Payne, Debtors-Appellants v. Charles R. Wood, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Keck v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Hyman v. Plotkin (In Re Hyman)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Andermahr v. Barrus (In Re Andermahr)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Alderman v. Martinson (In Re Alderman)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Gilbert v. Zimmer (In Re Gilbert)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
- Morgan-Busby v. Gladstone (In Re Morgan-Busby)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- In Re BellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1995
- In Re DavisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.