Dunton v. Harper
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Benet, J., Barnwell, November, 1901. Action by F. W. Dunton against Emma H. Harper et al. From order permitting plaintiff to file security for costs after expiration of time fixed in order providing same, defendants appeal. The following is the security permitted filed: “ (Case stated.) We acknowledge ourselves liable for the costs of this case, and consent that if the plaintiff fail to recover, the defendant may have execution for his costs against us.
Read the full summary
Before Benet, J., Barnwell, November, 1901. Action by F. W. Dunton against Emma H. Harper et al. From order permitting plaintiff to file security for costs after expiration of time fixed in order providing same, defendants appeal. The following is the security permitted filed: “ (Case stated.) We acknowledge ourselves liable for the costs of this case, and consent that if the plaintiff fail to recover, the defendant may have execution for his costs against us. Given under our hands, this 3d day of October, A. D. 1901. J. Allen’ Patterson, H. A. Patterson. Witness : W. Gilmore Simms, C. C. P.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Pope.
Upon notice and after argument on both sides, judge James Aldrich, on the 16th day of July, 1901, ordered the plaintiff, who was a non-resident of this Slate, to file security for costs, under the requirements of Rule X. of Circuit Court, within sixty days from the rising of the Court, and that he be nonsuited on failure so to do. The Circuit Court for Barnwell County rose and adjourned 'sine die on July 17th, 1901. No compliance with Rule X. of the Circuit Court was made by plaintiff within the sixty days after adjournment of Court. A…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Carroll v. Cash MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Graham v. Town of LorisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Duncan v. DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
- Poston v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Rutledge v. Junior Order of United American MechanicsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.