Heyl v. Bary
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Henderson, J.,
The plaintiff’s action was brought to recover the amount paid by him on a promissory note on which he was an endorser. The obligation was dated June 5, 1924, and executed by the Pennsylvania Novelty Manufacturing Company, a corporation, for $1,665 payable in three months to the order of that company. The note was endorsed by the payee and by John B. Heyl, H. A. Bary and Howard S. Neiman, Jr. The money realized thereon was received by the maker of the note. Payment at maturity having been made, Heyl took up the note after notice of protest. His action is to recover from…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Donnan v. BarnesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Lazaran v. SemansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922