Legal Opinion

Rose v. Geico

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 13, 2012No. 1D11-4843PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this workers’ compensation appeal, claimant seeks review of an order denying the compensability of her claimed repetitive trauma injury and associated benefits. We agree that the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) imposed an improper burden of proof on her, and, for the reasons that follow, reverse the JCC’s denial of benefits.

The parties were previously before this court, at which time we affirmed the JCC’s finding that the statute of limitations had expired regarding claimant’s compensable bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome with a 1999 date of accident, and reversed the JCC’s finding that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Festa v. Teleflex, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. BROADSPIRE v. RoseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. Troche v. GeicoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Caceres v. Sedano's SupermarketsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Leon Smith v. City of Daytona Beach Police Dept./City of etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API