Legal Opinion

Friday v. Parkhurst

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1896No. 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Snohomish County.— Hon; John C. Denney, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage on certain lots in Friday’s Addition to Everett. The appellant filed a plat of this addition in the office of the county auditor of Snohomish county, on the 24th day of February, 1892. Upon the 15th day of September, 1892, the county commissioners at the request of the plaintiff granted an order vacating certain portions of said plat. Upon the 28th day of October, 1892, appellant sold to the respondents certain lots in the vacated portion of said plat and gave his warranty deed to the same, and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Conta v. CorgiatWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Shaw v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Day v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Greenwood v. BeanWashington Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API