Legal Opinion

Bossier Chrysler-Dodge II, Inc. v. Rauschenberg

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 2007No. 06-0874PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal we are asked to consider whether the case should be remanded for a new trial on attorney’s fees. A divided court of appeals affirmed the attorney’s fees award although it reduced the trial court’s damage award by eighty-seven percent. 201 S.W.3d 787. We have said that the issue of attorney’s fees should ordinarily be retried under these circumstances unless the appellate court is “reasonably certain that the jury was not significantly influenced by the erroneous [damage award].” Barker v. Eckman, 213 S.W.3d 306 (Tex.2006). Our opinion in Barker issued after the court of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barker v. EckmanTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Bossier Chrysler Dodge II, Inc. v. Rauschenberg, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Horizon Health Corporation v. Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. Psychiatric Resource Partners, Inc. Michael A. Saul Timothy J. Palus Peter D. Ulasewicz Barbara H. Bayma And John M. PiechockiTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Barry v. Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  3. Republic Petroleum LLC and Republic Petroleum Partners, LP v. Dynamic Offshore Resources NS LLC and W&T Offshore Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Lone Starr Multi-Theatres, Ltd. v. Max Interests, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  5. People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API