Verizon New England Inc. v. Transcom Enhanced Services, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Catterson, J.
In this CPLR article 52 turnover proceeding, we affirm that a restraining notice is effective only if, at the time of service, the third party on whom the notice is served owes a debt to, or is in possession of property of, the judgment debtor.
In this proceeding, Verizon, the judgment creditor, seeks to enforce a restraining notice against a third party pursuant to article 52 of the CPLR, on monies paid by Transcom Enhanced Services, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Transcom) to judgment debtor, Global NAPs, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as GNAPS), a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Glassman v. HyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- ABKCO Industries, Inc. v. Apple Films, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Herrmann & Grace v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Herrmann Grace v. . the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Supreme Merchandise Co. v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.