Legal Opinion

Trinity Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 12, 1956No. 15155Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

On rehearing appellant calls our attention to the wording of art. 21.16 Insurance Code, which provides that misrepresentations in an insurance application shall not be a defense in a suit on the policy unless “the matter or thing misrepresented was material to the risk or actually contributed to the contingency or event on which said policy became due and payable * * (Emphasis supplied.)

Appellant contends that the use of the disjunctive word “or” shows that it was intended that the insurer might obtain cancellation of the policy by proving either (1) that the misrepresentations…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Clark v. National Life & Accident InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. New York Life Insurance v. KuhlenschmidtIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Great Southern Life Ins. Co. v. DoyleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941
  5. Great Southern Life Insurance v. DoyleTexas Supreme Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API