Legal Opinion
Town of Saranac v. Town of Plattsburgh
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 3, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Mikoll, J. P.
Appeal from *867an order of the Supreme Court (Ryan, Jr., J.), entered March 18, 1993 in Clinton County, which, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with the Statute of Limitations.
This litigation concerns a dispute between the parties over a boundary line common to both Towns established by a statute enacted by the State Legislature in 1824 (L 1824, ch CXXIX). The pertinent statutory language states that "all that part of the Town of Plattsburgh, lying west of a line two miles west of Platt’s six thousand six hundred acre location,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Solnick v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Galway v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- 509 Sixth Avenue Corp. v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- La Porto v. Village of PhilmontNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- County of Chenango v. County of BroomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by3 opinions
- Augeri v. Roman Catholic DioceseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Town of Plattsburgh v. Town of SaranacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Rural Community Coalition, Inc. v. Village of BloomingburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015