Legal Opinion

Raymond L. Rutherford v. Illinois Central Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1960No. 17865PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case the district judge, able- and experienced and trained in the common law, directed a verdict for the defendant railroad, holding that: (1) the-plaintiff “failed to show where the railroad company was negligent at all”; (2) “as a matter of law [the plaintiff failed' to show that the defendant] was guilty-of contributory negligence”; (3) the doctrine of last clear chance was inapplicable. On appeal this Court affirmed the judgment below. We agreed with the district judge as to each of the three-bases for the directed verdict.

The appellant has now applied for a-, rehearing. He…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rottman v. BeverlySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  2. Tillman v. Public Belt R. R. CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. John A. James, and Service Fire Insurance Company of New York, Intervenor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc., and Mission Gas Oil Company, Inc. And Petroleum Products Co. v. Texaco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
  3. Delome v. Union Barge Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Vahlco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. M. H. Hogan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API