Legal Opinion

Ashcraft v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 8, 1985No. 84-811PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTT, Acting Chief Judge.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error and we therefore affirm. However, because of a clerical error in the court’s written judgment, we remand for correction.

The parties agree that a jury found appellant guilty of unarmed burglary, a second-degree felony. However, the written judgment erroneously adjudicates appellant guilty of armed burglary, a first-degree felony. No sentence was imposed for this crime.

Consequently, we remand this cause to the trial court for correction of the clerical…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zigler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parajon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API