Interest of Rogers v. Williams
Delaware Family Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLMAN, Judge.
In this modification of custody petition filed by Aladino T. Rogers (“petitioner”) against Brenda Williams (“respondent”) for custody of the parties’ two sons, respondent objects to the admissibility of a videotape taken by petitioner’s present wife of the interior of respondent’s residence without her knowledge or consent. The issues are: (a) whether the videotape should be excluded due to the wrongful means by which it was obtained, (b) the relevance of the videotape, and (c) whether the danger of unfair prejudice substantially outweighs the videotape’s probative value.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Munson v. MunsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Department of Social Services v. Janice P.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ABID VS. ABID (CHILD CUSTODY)Nevada Supreme Court · 2017
- ABID VS. ABID (CHILD CUSTODY)Nevada Supreme Court · 2017