Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. . H.S. Kerbaugh, Incorporated

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 1, 1916, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to compel the plaintiff separately to state and number the causes of action attempted to be set forth in the complaint.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 1, 1916, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to compel the plaintiff separately to state and number the causes of action attempted to be set forth in the complaint. The following question was certified: “ Does the complaint, in violation of section 483 of the Code of Civil Procedure, state two or more of the following causes of action, namely (1) an alleged cause of action against the defendants for the rescission of the two contracts…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Oh. J., Chase, Collin, Hogan, Oar•dozo and Crane, JJ. Absent: McLaughlin, J.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. Chiarello Stevedoring Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Bob v. HecksherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  3. Hull v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API