Hastings v. Reynolds Metals Co.

BRIGGLE, District Judge.

Appellant as petitioner in the district court sought to compel appellee to re-employ him as an assistant plant manager of one of its industrial properties. He relics upon the provisions of the Selective Training- and Service Act of 1940.1 The question involved on this appeal is whether the District Court erred in holding appellee was under no duty under the facts of this case to restore appellant to said position.

In connection with the determination of the facts questions of evidence and practice have arisen and will be first considered. A written contract of…