Legal Opinion
(PC) Marti v. Manning
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 13, 2024No. 2:21-cv-01829Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALEX LAMOTA MARTI, No. 2:21-cv-01829 SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 TODD MANNING, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed two motions for sanctions (ECF Nos. 42, 46), which are fully 19 briefed. For the reasons set forth below, the court will deny both motions. The court will also 20 deny his associated motion for an order granting the second motion for sanctions (ECF No. 71), 21 and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont Corporation, Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Kitsap Physicians ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Glover v. Bic Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- In Re Napster, Inc. Copyright LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.