Legal Opinion

Werbelovsky v. Michael

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, David Michael, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in tlie office of the clerk of the County of Kings on the 23d day of February, 1905.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, J.:

The order appealed from restrains the defendant Michael from collecting or receiving certain moneys held by the defendant Rosenberg, and from prosecuting an action in the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York against said Rosenberg to recover said moneys. The action is brought to ■ set aside ah assignment of said moneys made by. the defendant' Kurtz' to the' defendant Michael on the ground that the same was fraudulent and void as to creditors. The order is undoubtedly irregular in that it does not recite the grounds, *139upon which it was granted, and in that it does not require the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McHenry v. . JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Frees v. BlythAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Metropolitan Steamship Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Hart v. A. L. Clarke & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Klatzko v. GolodetzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API