Legal Opinion

MID-CTY. FUTURE ALT. v. Port. Metro. Area LGBC

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 27, 1985No. 1950 CA A30904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

695 P.2d 937 (1985)

72 Or.App. 235

MID-COUNTY FUTURE ALTERNATIVES COMMITTEE, an Oregon Corporation, Bonnie McKnight, Dorothy Smith, John T. Baker, Jane E. Baker, Thomas Dennehy and Robert Luce, Petitioners,

v.

PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION, Respondent, City of Portland and City of Gresham, Intervenors-Respondents.

1950; CA A30904.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted December 28, 1984.

Decided February 27, 1985.

Matthew R. Baines, Gresham, argued the cause for intervenor-respondent City of Gresham. With him on the brief was Thomas Sponsler, Gresham.

Richard…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aloha Incorporation Advisory Committee v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. City of Fairview v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API