Legal Opinion

Samuel G. Braun, Inc. v. McKinney

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 29, 1944No. 67PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

On the facts, Colonial Acceptance Corp. v. Messick, 120 Conn. 585, 182 A. 133, compels reversal,1 for we must follow the decision of the highest court of Connecticut, construing a statute of that state, as to the validity of conditional sales. In that case, it was held that the reasonable time for recording runs not from the delivery of the goods but from the making of the recorded contract “unless perhaps where the rights of third persons have intervened.” Here there were no such intervening rights, for all the claims filed in the bankruptcy proceedings were incurred…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Standard Acceptance Corp. v. ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  2. Colonial Acceptance Corporation v. MessickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Amity Dyeing & Finishing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  2. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API