Ludwig v. Pacific Fire Insurance
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtWendel, J.
Action to recover for the theft of an automobile under a policy insuring plaintiff, among other things, against “ theft, robbery or pilferage, excepting by any person or persons in the assured’s household or in the assured’s service or employment * * One Eckele was conducting what purported *190to be a business for the storage, repair and sale of automobiles. Plaintiff, on December 7, 1920, consigned his car to Eckele for the purpose of having the same sold. A consignment order was made out and signed by plaintiff and accepted by Eckele wherein it appears that plaintiff placed his car with Eckele…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Delafield v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Van Vechten v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Siegel v. Union Assurance SocietyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1915
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re CarrollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Gulf Finance & Securities Co. v. National Fire InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- People v. WebsterJustice Court of Town of Perinton · 1987