Legal Opinion

Bankston 695070 v. Burgess

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided August 17, 2023No. 1:23-cv-00529Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ______ JEROME ANTHONY BANKSTON, Petitioner, Case No. 1:23-cv-529 v. Honorable Robert J. Jonker MICHAEL BURGESS, Respondent. ____________________________/ OPINION This is a habeas corpus action brought by a state prisoner under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Promptly after the filing of a petition for habeas corpus, the Court must undertake a preliminary review of the petition to determine whether “it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API