Nichols v. State

Johnson, Presiding Judge.

Roy Nichols was tried before a jury and convicted of possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, possession of marijuana, attempting to elude an officer, and reckless driving.1 He appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the drug convictions. The challenge is without merit, so we affirm the convictions.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, the appellant is no longer presumed innocent, and the appellate court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict.2 The court does not weigh the evidence or determine witness…