Legal Opinion

Arthur Robinson v. Coca-Cola Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 22, 2012No. 11-30130UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES E. GRAVES, JR., Circuit Judge: *

The Succession of Robinson appeals the district court’s grant of a motion to dismiss for Coca-Cola in an action for judicial partition and for restoration to the situation prior to a series of contracts entered into by Robinson. Because the district court properly granted the motion to dismiss, we AFFIRM.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1934, Edward Barq, the originator of Barq’s soft drinks, and Jesse Robinson (“Jesse”), the father of Arthur Robinson (“Arthur”), entered into a franchise agreement (the “1934 Agreement”), which permitted Jesse to manufacture…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Katrina Canal Breaches LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  2. Kibbe v. LegeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. LeBlanc v. AdamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Roy v. RoyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. West v. WestLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sons v. Medtronic Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API