Legal Opinion
Morato-Rodriguez v. Riva Construction Group, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 20, 2011PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The motion court correctly determined that plaintiffs claims against defendant Riva are barred by Workers’ Compensation Law § 11. Riva demonstrated that it and nonparty WTS Contracting Corp. are alter egos by establishing that they share a president and chief executive, an office manager and an office address, and were insured by the same liability and Workers’ Compensation policies (see Carty v East 175th St. Hous. Dev. Fund, Corp., 83 AD3d 529 [2011]). Although plaintiff was paid with a WTS check and WTS was identified as his employer in the report regarding his accident as well as in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Carty v. East 175th Street Housing Development Fund Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Vera v. NYC Partnership Development Fund Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kittay v. MoskowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Faulk v. Rockaway One Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- McDonald v. Winter Bros. Transfer Station Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Rodriguez v. Dairyland HP, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Faulk v. Rockaway One Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.