Legal Opinion

Doe v. State of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Court of Claims, New York County (Gerard Weisberg, J.), entered July 20, 1993, which denied claimant’s motion for an order permitting her to file a late claim in accordance with Court of Claims Act § 10 (5) and (6), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In her motion to file a late notice of claim pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (5), which permits a claimant under a legal disability to file a claim within two years after the disability is removed, plaintiff asserted that the notice of claim was not made within the statutory 90 day period because she was under a mental disability…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Finnerty v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Prusack v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Berger v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Muscat v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Ibekweh v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API