Legal Opinion
S.H. v. Mount Diablo Unified School District
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 3, 2017No. Case No. 16-cv-04308-JCSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 29-
JOSEPH G. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
In this action, Plaintiff S.H. seeks judicial review of an administrative decision of California’s Office of Administrative Hearings '(‘‘OAH”) under' the Individuals, with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq, Presently before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment by S.H, and the Mount Diablo Unified School District. A hearing- on the motions was held on June 2,; 2017. Following…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Amanda J., a Minor, by and Through Her Guardian Ad Litem, Annette J. v. Clark County School District, and Nevada State Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- C.B. v. Board of Education of City of Chicago, District 299District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- E.C.D v. San Diego Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
- G.R. v. Del Mar Union High School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020