Bartnett v. Handy
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtDe Courcy, J.
This appeal from a judgment for the defendant based upon a finding of a judge sitting without a jury presents no question of law. De Propper, petitioner, 236 Mass. 500, and cases cited at page 501. The parties, however, have argued the case as if the record presented exceptions to a ruling by the judge solely upon the findings in the auditor’s report treated as agreed facts. Manning v. Woodlawn Cemetery Corp. 239 Mass. 5, 9. Even if the record be so treated, the judgment must be affirmed.
In October, 1915, the plaintiff received from W. H. Miner a certificate for two hundred and fifty shares…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harvey v. SquireMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Manning v. Woodlawn Cemetery Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- In re de PropperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Lilienthal v. Suffolk Brewing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
3Cited by8 opinions
- Berry v. KyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Brockton Olympia Realty Co. v. LeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- McMillan v. WickstromMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Holmes v. Birtman Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Arthur A. Johnson Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.