Legal Opinion
Grynberg v. Bp P.L.C.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 8, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2008-0301Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JACK J. GRYNBERG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 08-301 (JDB) BP P.L.C., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Today the Court has issued a memorandum opinion denying plaintiff Jack Grynberg’s Rule 60 motion. Also pending before the Court is defendants’ motion to seal the exhibits attached to their Rule 60 opposition. 1 See Defs.’ Rule 60 Mot. to Seal [ECF No. 129]. While briefing defendants’ motion, the parties successfully narrowed the range of disputed exhibits. Grynberg has agreed that seven exhibits may remain under…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Children's Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Zapp v. Zhenli Ye GonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- In Re: In the Matter of the Fort Totten Metrorail Cases Arising Out of the Events of June 22, 2009District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- American Professional Agency, Inc. v. NASW Assurance Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013