Legal Opinion

Rich & Rich Trading Co. v. Theodore, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*308It is well settled that the harsh remedy of striking a pleading should not be employed without a clear showing of deliberate and willful refusal to disclose (Washington v Alco Auto Sales, 199 AD2d 165), i.e., "where the refusal to obey an order for disclosure or failure to disclose pursuant to notice is clearly contumacious or deliberate” (Berman v Szpilzinger, 180 AD2d 612). The penalty to be imposed for such a refusal or failure is a matter within the sound discretion of the court (supra). Here, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to dismiss the plaintiffs complaint for failure to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Berman v. SzpilzingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Washington v. Alco Auto SalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New v. Scores Entertainment, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Bingham v. StruveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API