Legal Opinion

Clements v. Fashing

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided September 9, 1982No. 80-1290PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

457 U.S. 957 (1982)

CLEMENTS, GOVERNOR OF TEXAS, ET AL.

v.

FASHING ET AL.

No. 80-1290.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued January 12, 1982.

Decided June 25, 1982.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

James P. Allison, Assistant Attorney General of Texas, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Mark White, Attorney General, John W. Fainter, Jr., First Assistant Attorney General, and Richard E. Gray III, Executive Assistant Attorney General.

Raymond C. Caballero argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief was John L. Fashing, pro se.[*]

2Opinion of the Court · RehnquistJustice Rehnquist, joined by The Chief Justice, Justice Powell, and Justice O'Connor

Appe…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.

3Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GuytonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. Brandt v. PompaOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Brandt v. PompaOhio Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API