Insurance Commissioner v. Lincoln National Life Insurance
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
BLOOM, Judge.
The sole issue in this appeal is one of statutory construction. The statute in question, Md.Code Ann., art. 48A, § 234B(b) (1991 Repl.Vol.), was interpreted one way by the Insurance Commissioner of Maryland and a different way by the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, to which the Commissioner’s decision was appealed by Lincoln National Life Insurance Corporation (Lincoln). The Commissioner and Gerald Veydt, in whose favor the Commissioner had ruled, then filed this appeal from the judgment of the circuit court.
We believe that the Commissioner’s interpretation of the statute was…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Ramsay, Scarlett & Co. v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Board of Educ., Garrett Co. v. LendoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Mayor of Baltimore v. HackelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lincoln National Life Ins. Co. v. INSURANCE COMM'R OF THE STATE OF MARYLANDCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Veydt v. Lincoln National Life InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Lincoln National Life Ins. Co. v. INSURANCE COMM'R OF THE STATE OF MARYLANDCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Lincoln National Life Ins. Co. v. INSURANCE COMM'R OF THE STATE OF MARYLANDCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992